SKILLEMALL.ai

CD implement-spec

Implement an existing spec through committed passes. Use for long or multi-pass specs that need maintenance checkpoints to periodically clean code, handoffs, priorities, and plan bloat before drift accumulates.

dzhng/jevgrep Agent Skills author: dzhng 1 file body ≈ 3 884 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Implement an existing spec through committed passes.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../screenshot-critique/SKILL.md, ../refactor-clean/SKILL.md, ../review/SKILL.md

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../screenshot-critique/SKILL.md, ../refactor-clean/SKILL.md, ../review/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../screenshot-critique/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../refactor-clean/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../review/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../audit-decisions/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../close-spec/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../write-docs/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../preview-shots/SKILL.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 28, 90): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../screenshot-critique/SKILL.md, ../refactor-clean/SKILL.md, ../review/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: ../screenshot-critique/SKILL.md, ../refactor-clean/SKILL.md, ../review/SKILL.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 22 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3884 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 210: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.