BD hunt-sqli
Hunting skill for sqli vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports including modern NoSQL injection (Rocket.Chat CVE-2021-22911 MongoDB $regex, Mongoose ORM CVE-2024-53900 $where bypass), modern ORM raw-fragment SQLi (Django CVE-2024-42005, Sequelize GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw), second-order SOQL injection (HackerOne Salesforce), time-based blind SQLi in GraphQL resolvers, and SQLi on OIDC-proxy backends. Use when hunting SQLi on any target. Dedicated NoSQL operator injection (MongoDB/CouchDB $where/$regex/$ne) is owned by hunt-nosqli — NoSQL appears here only as adjacent ORM/WAF context.
Hunting skill for sqli vulnerabilities.
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)description: Hunting skill for sqli vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports including modern NoSQL injection (Rocket.Chat CVE-…911 MongoDB $regex, Mongoose ORM CVE-…900 $w
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:34Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)SQL injection remains one of the highest-paying vulnerability classes in bug bounty because it directly threatens data confidentiality, integrity, and availability at scale.
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:379Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)A company's marketing site ran WordPress with the Huge IT Video Gallery plugin. The plugin's `album_id` parameter was unparameterized. Because the site shared database credentials with other services,
detector
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5306 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "sources" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "report_count" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 41, 249, 369, 370): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5306 tokens
- 100Steps. 84 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 601: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
- +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.