SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD commit-ko

AI(Claude 등)가 제안한 한글 커밋 메시지의 사무적·번역투 어휘("~을 수행함", "~을 진행함", "~적 개선을 실시함" 등)를 실제 개발자가 쓰는 자연스러운 한국어 커밋 메시지로 다듬는 스킬. humanize-korean과 달리 산문 문단이 아니라 1~2줄짜리 커밋 메시지 register에 특화되어 진단·청킹 없이 단일 콜로 즉시 처리한다. 트리거 — "커밋 메시지 자연스럽게", "커밋 메시지 다듬어줘", "이 커밋 메시지 AI 티 나", "commit message 한국어로 자연스럽게", "커밋 메시지 어색해", "커밋 메시지 사람처럼".

epoko77-ai/im-not-ai Agent Skills author: epoko77-ai MIT 2 files body ≈ 409 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

AI(Claude 등)가 제안한 한글 커밋 메시지의 사무적·번역투 어휘("~을 수행함", "~을 진행함", "~적 개선을 실시함" 등)를 실제 개발자가 쓰는 자연스러운 한국어 커밋 메시지로 다듬는 스킬.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 409 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 311: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.