SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC humanize-scan

한글 글에 AI 티가 얼마나 있는지 재고, 실제로 고치면 어떻게 되는지 표본으로 보여주는 정찰 스킬. 실측 판별력 상위 6개만 본다. 워크스페이스·진단·게이트·서브에이전트 없이 이 대화 안에서 끝낸다(파일 0개, 서브에이전트 0회). 손볼 게 많다고 나오면 전수 윤문은 humanize-korean(=/humanize)으로 넘긴다. 트리거 — "이 글 AI 같아?", "AI 티 있나 봐줘", "스캔해줘", "윤문 돌릴 값어치 있나", "AI 티 점수", "quick humanize", "/humanize-scan".

epoko77-ai/im-not-ai Claude Code author: epoko77-ai MIT 1 file body ≈ 712 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

한글 글에 AI 티가 얼마나 있는지 재고, 실제로 고치면 어떻게 되는지 표본으로 보여주는 정찰 스킬.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 16 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 712 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 290: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.