SKILLEMALL.ai

BB seo-project-setup

Populate a project's shared OpenSEO context — site scope, goals, positioning, competitors, key pages, and preferences — plus MCP checks and Search Console intake.

every-app/open-seo Agent Skills author: every-app MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 250 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Populate a project's shared OpenSEO context — site scope, goals, positioning, competitors, key pages, and preferences — plus MCP checks and Search Console…

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureMarketingAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: seo-project-setup (every-app/open-seo)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 66 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2250 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 162: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.