SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC generating-test-reports

Generate structured test reports with pass/fail rollups, coverage summaries, and test artifacts. Use when the user is asking for test-result packaging or delivery, not for root-cause debugging or feature implementation.

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills Agent Skills author: foryourhealth111-pixel Apache-2.0 10 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 246 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 30 h ago

Generate structured test reports with pass/fail rollups, coverage summaries, and test artifacts.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 246 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.