SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC scientific-data-preprocessing

⚠️ CRITICAL USER EXPERIENCE-BASED SKILL - ALWAYS CONSULT BEFORE DATA PREPROCESSING ⚠️ Prevents catastrophic errors (88.9% error rate in V1.0 case study) through multi-level feature analysis, data leakage detection, and semantic validation. MANDATORY for: data preprocessing, feature engineering, standardization, normalization, interpolation, missing value handling, feature selection, or ANY data transformation task. Covers grouped time-series, cross-sectional, panel data. Detects: time travel leakage, causal inversion, ID misuse, semantic-numeric fallacies, distribution blindness. User's hard-won lessons from real project failures.

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills Agent Skills author: foryourhealth111-pixel Apache-2.0 8 files body ≈ 4 782 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 30 h ago

⚠️ CRITICAL USER EXPERIENCE-BASED SKILL - ALWAYS CONSULT BEFORE DATA PREPROCESSING ⚠️ Prevents catastrophic errors (88.9% error rate in V1.0 case study)…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, running it twice

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4782 tokens
    • 85Steps. 84 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 638: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 27 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
    • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.