AB ui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence for web and mobile. Searchable local database with 84 styles, 192 color palettes, 74 font pairings, 192 product types, 98 UX guidelines, 104 icon entries, 16 GSAP motion presets, and 25 chart types across 22 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, Astro, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui, Jetpack Compose, Angular, Laravel, JavaFX, WPF, WinUI, Avalonia, Uno Platform, UWP, Three.js, and HTML/CSS). Use when designing, building, or reviewing UI: pages, components, color schemes, typography, layout, accessibility, animation, or data visualization.
The same skill from clawhub has been run on models: No improvement D see the result → This is a copy: its text may differ, so the grade is not carried over.
UI/UX design intelligence for web and mobile.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usedata/stacks/nuxtjs.csv:53Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)52,Environment,Use runtimeConfig for env vars,Access environment variables safely,runtimeConfig in nuxt.config,process.env directly,"runtimeConfig: { apiSecret: '', public: { apiBase: '' } }",process.vendor-host
Files scanned: 42. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 19 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3224 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 595: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.