CD correction-pipeline
When the user corrects a factual error, root-cause it immediately. Don't just note the correction — trace the error to its source, fix the source, and prevent recurrence. Every factual error is either a data error (bad brain page, bad memory file, bad rendered SOUL/USER identity, bad facts row) or a hallucination (LLM confabulated from partial signals).
When the user corrects a factual error, root-cause it immediately.
As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../_brain-filing-rules.md, ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../conventions/brain-first.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../_brain-filing-rules.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mutating" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "writes_pages" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "writes_to" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "upstream"
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../_brain-filing-rules.md, ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3190 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 355: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.