SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC blog-ingest

Feed and whole-publication ingestion: turn an entire blog, newsletter, or RSS/Atom archive into brain source pages. Covers feed discovery, pagination walking, normalization to a common article shape, canonical-URL dedup, idempotent re-runs, 429 pacing, and empty-husk repair. This is the PUBLICATION-scope skill — a single article URL routes to idea-ingest instead. Per-article enrichment hands off to the brain-ingest-gate skill; public posts only (gated content is skipped, never worked around).

garrytan/gbrain Agent Skills author: garrytan MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 605 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Feed and whole-publication ingestion: turn an entire blog, newsletter, or RSS/Atom archive into brain source pages.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../conventions/test-before-bulk.md, ../conventions/untrusted-content.md

ProcedureWordPressWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
60
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../conventions/test-before-bulk.md, ../conventions/untrusted-content.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: blog-ingest (garrytan/gbrain)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Instruction override medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous SKILL.md:105
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "ignore previous instructions," embedded tool-call syntax, or urgent demands
    quoted

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../conventions/brain-first.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../conventions/test-before-bulk.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../conventions/untrusted-content.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "mutating"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "writes_pages"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "writes_to"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "upstream"

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../conventions/test-before-bulk.md, ../conventions/untrusted-content.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../conventions/brain-first.md, ../conventions/test-before-bulk.md, ../conventions/untrusted-content.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 46 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3605 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 497: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.