CC google-loops
Set up and operate the Gmail/Calendar/Contacts connector and the open-loop engine: who is waiting on the user, what they promised, and the context needed to respond. Covers painless BYO OAuth setup (exactly two user interactions), the daily `gbrain waiting` digest, loop closing/muting, and troubleshooting via the typed error catalog.
Set up and operate the Gmail/Calendar/Contacts connector and the open-loop engine: who is waiting on the user, what they promised, and the context needed to…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mutating" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "writes_pages" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 152): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2262 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 335: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.