SKILLEMALL.ai

BC y2k-camcorder-photo

Transform a modern photo into a cheap 2003 consumer DV camcorder still — blown-flash overexposure, VHS tracking lines, green pixel timestamp, off-center home-video framing. How it works: 1. Locks your face from the reference image you upload 2. Picks an era recipe (1996 VHS, 2000 MiniDV, 2003 DV, 2007 flip-phone) 3. Adds period-correct wardrobe and a low-light interior scene 4. Layers grain, chromatic aberration, and the timestamp overlay 5. Outputs a 4:3 frame that reads as a paused home video

genspark Agent Skills author: Genspark 1 file body ≈ 8 960 tokens Open the sourcegenspark.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, execution cost

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8960 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8960 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 112 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 500: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 39 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 112 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.