SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB agent-skill-stack

Find, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 11 files body ≈ 2 400 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 22 h ago

Find, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal.

As a process B 78/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

AnalyzerGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
78/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/security-installation.md:20
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - destructive commands, broad writes, persistence, reverse shells, or privilege escalation;

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 78/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 41 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2400 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 607: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.