SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-tests

Creates integration test cases targeting Oracle for .NET data access artifacts. Tests capture Oracle expected behavior as the authoritative baseline; they are written once and later ported to PostgreSQL by migrating the test project in Phase 6. Use only during Phase 3, before any PostgreSQL migration work has begun. Do not invoke during Phase 6 or against a project that has already been migrated.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 1 file body ≈ 953 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 23 h ago

Creates integration test cases targeting Oracle for .NET data access artifacts. Tests capture Oracle expected behavior as the authoritative baseline; they are…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting

IntegrationPostgreSQLSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 953 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 399: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.