AD foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit
Ongoing development guidance for agentic web apps that pair a CopilotKit frontend with Microsoft Agent Framework agents on Azure AI Foundry hosted agents over the AG-UI protocol - add and gate agent tools, wire human-in-the-loop approvals, build generative UI and shared state, debug the event stream, upgrade pre-1.0 packages safely, and deploy hosted agent updates.
Ongoing development guidance for agentic web apps that pair a CopilotKit frontend with Microsoft Agent Framework agents on Azure AI Foundry hosted agents over…
As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Concealment
en-hide-from-userSKILL.md:98Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)3. At least one follow-up turn was sent in the same thread after an approval, and the gated tool did NOT silently execute again ([references/hitl.md](references/hitl.md), duplicate-execution hazard).
negated
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 36): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2165 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 367: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.