SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC java-debugging

Debug Java applications systematically: JDWP remote debugging, jdb, VS Code and IntelliJ attach, debugging Maven/Gradle tests, Spring Boot and Quarkus dev mode, containers, breakpoints/logpoints, and reading stack traces. Use when the user needs to find the cause of a Java bug, exception, wrong behavior, or failing test, or asks how to attach a debugger.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github 2 files body ≈ 2 028 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Debug Java applications systematically: JDWP remote debugging, jdb, VS Code and IntelliJ attach, debugging Maven/Gradle tests, Spring Boot and Quarkus dev…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureVS CodeKubernetesDockerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2028 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.