CC lean-comments
Audits, writes, and refines maintained first-party source-code comments and declaration-level documentation across languages. Use when adding, editing, reviewing, cleaning up, or auditing comments, doc comments, docstrings, TODO, FIXME, NOTE, suppressions, or other source commentary, including while modifying code and deciding whether a comment is warranted at all. Defaults to no comment unless it preserves meaningful, non-obvious information that cannot reasonably be recovered from the code or nearby repository context.
Audits, writes, and refines maintained first-party source-code comments and declaration-level documentation across languages.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5190 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 94, 346, 405): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5190 tokens
- 100Steps. 100 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 22 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (12 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 526: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 100 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.