SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC onboard-context-matic

Interactive onboarding tour for the context-matic MCP server. Walks the user through what the server does, shows all available APIs, lets them pick one to explore, explains it in their project language, demonstrates model_search and endpoint_search live, and ends with a menu of things the user can ask the agent to do. USE FOR: first-time setup; "what can this MCP do?"; "show me the available APIs"; "onboard me"; "how do I use the context-matic server"; "give me a tour". DO NOT USE FOR: actually integrating an API end-to-end (use integrate-context-matic instead).

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 206 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

Interactive onboarding tour for the context-matic MCP server.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationSlackAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 37 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3206 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 568: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.