SKILLEMALL.ai

AB pinecone-rag

Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user mentions Pinecone, wants to index documents for semantic search, build a retrieval-augmented generation system, store agent memory across sessions, implement hybrid search, or connect an LLM to a searchable knowledge base — even if they don't say "Pinecone" explicitly. Also use when the user asks about vector databases for RAG, namespace isolation for multi-tenant agents, embedding pipelines, or scaling a knowledge base beyond what local storage can handle. DO NOT use for local-only vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, pgvector) or pure keyword search with no semantic component.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 193 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 22 h ago

Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend.

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
55
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 9 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2193 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 720: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.