SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC salesforce-component-standards

Quality standards for Salesforce Lightning Web Components (LWC), Aura components, and Visualforce pages. Covers SLDS 2 compliance, accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), data access pattern selection, component communication rules, XSS prevention, CSRF enforcement, FLS/CRUD in AuraEnabled methods, view state management, and Jest test requirements. Use this skill when building or reviewing any Salesforce UI component to enforce platform-specific security and quality standards.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 316 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 22 h ago

Quality standards for Salesforce Lightning Web Components (LWC), Aura components, and Visualforce pages.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ReferenceSalesforceSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:181
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      | FLS not checked in custom controller | VF / Apex | Privilege escalation | Add `Schema.sObjectType` checks |

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 91): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 85Steps. 31 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2316 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 470: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.