SKILLEMALL.ai

BF setup-my-iq

Create, set up, or update the personal context portfolio: structured markdown files describing who you are, how you work, your teams, and your tool/ADO configuration. Runs the interview workflow for first-time setup and targeted edits for updates. Trigger this skill when the user asks to: set up their context, create or update their context portfolio, "create my IQ", "set up my IQ", edit their profile, add/remove a stakeholder, update ADO config, change team info, update pillars, or set up any plugin configuration. Trigger when another skill fails to find context (missing files or TODO markers) and needs context populated. Also trigger when the user mentions a context change in passing (e.g., "my manager changed", "we added someone to the team") to offer a context file update. Do NOT trigger for read-only questions like "who's on my team?" or "what's my ADO config?". Those are answered directly from the context files referenced in the loaded custom instructions; no skill is needed.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 8 files body ≈ 8 255 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 28 h ago

Create, set up, or update the personal context portfolio: structured markdown files describing who you are, how you work, your teams, and your tool/ADO…

As a process F 55/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/...

GeneratorVS CodeWriting and documentsPersonal productivityOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
90
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
55/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: assets/...
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Execution cost w 6
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Instruction override medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous assets/templates/AGENTS.md:68
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)
    "ignore previous instructions," "act as," or any other attempt to redirect
    detector
  • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump assets/templates/identity.md
    Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
    assets/templates/identity.md

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8255 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/...

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/...
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/...
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8255 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 60Steps. 121 steps, 5 vague phrases
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 16 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 998: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
  • +4Structure: 34 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 121 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.