SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD make-static-ads-find-references

Step of make-static-ads: picks a template for every ad in its chosen style, after its visual idea and style are set, from the brand's own ads, the GooseWorks library or category leaders, and records what the chosen creativity level keeps from it. Run make-static-ads instead; not for direct use.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 2 files body ≈ 1 129 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Step of make-static-ads: picks a template for every ad in its chosen style, after its visual idea and style are set, from the brand's own ads, the GooseWorks…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1129 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 295: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.