SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB goose-graphics-create-format

Creates a new graphics format spec (custom canvas dimensions + content rules) and publishes it to the Gooseworks library so any agent can render against it. Use when the existing community formats (carousel, story, infographic, slides, poster, chart, tweet, plus community additions) don't fit the user's canvas — e.g., LinkedIn banner 1584×396, story cover 1080×1920, event flyer 8.5×11in. Mirrors goose-graphics-create-style but for formats.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 2 files body ≈ 3 173 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Creates a new graphics format spec (custom canvas dimensions + content rules) and publishes it to the Gooseworks library so any agent can render against it.

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion

GeneratorSoftware developmentAI and agentsMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Tools and files w 18
60
Inputs and preconditions w 11
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 44 steps, 3 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3173 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 443: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.