SKILLEMALL.ai

BC meta-ad-manager

Front door and loop owner of a Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ad harness. Reads the brand's ads/ docs, works out which campaign the user means and which stage it is at, hands off to the stage skill that runs it (intake, strategy, creative, launch, checks, fixes, answers), and writes every stage change back to the docs. Use it when someone wants to run ads on Meta, comes back to ads they started earlier, a stage skill hands back, or a scheduled check fires.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 23 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 5 294 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Front door and loop owner of a Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ad harness.

As a process C 65/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/…

ProcedureMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
65/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: references/…
Tools and files w 18
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 23. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5294 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/…

Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/…
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/…
  • 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5294 tokens
  • 100Steps. 47 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (11 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 455: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.