SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB remix-graphic-ad-from-reference

Recreate a static graphic ad (Pinterest pin, IG/FB feed image, poster) from a reference image, swapping in a new brand's product and new copy while keeping the reference's layout, composition, and visual energy. ALWAYS generated with GPT Image 2 in edit-the-reference mode (fal-ai/gpt-image-1/edit-image, a billed FAL generation); the HTML/goose-graphics overlay is only an optional text-finishing step, never the generator. The static-graphics counterpart to the video remix-ad skill; this is what the app calls when a user picks a reference ad and wants it for their own product.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 10 files · 1 script body ≈ 4 625 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Recreate a static graphic ad (Pinterest pin, IG/FB feed image, poster) from a reference image, swapping in a new brand's product and new copy while keeping…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

ReferenceAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4625 tokens
    • 100Steps. 50 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 581: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.