SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC render-airdrop-carousel

Assemble a viral iOS "AirDrop" notification-carousel video ad (≈6–8s, 9:16) from a brand line plus 6–16 real product photos — a native AirDrop share-sheet card ("Brand would like to share a ___ · Decline / Accept") springs up and its preview window CYCLES through the products, landing on a range/lineup payoff with an Accept tap; a chime + soft per-swap ticks track the swaps. DETERMINISTIC assembly — an HTML card (real DOM text) rendered to PNG via headless Chrome, chroma-keyed, its magenta window refilled per-product in PIL, then animated + audio-synthed with FFmpeg. FREE (no paid model calls); the recipe supplies the brand line, product images, and payoff and gates the only optional paid step (a hero shot when the brand has NO usable photo → create-image-fal). Use for the airdrop-notification-carousel format.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 7 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 125 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Assemble a viral iOS "AirDrop" notification-carousel video ad (≈6–8s, 9:16) from a brand line plus 6–16 real product photos — a native AirDrop share-sheet…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

GeneratorPlaywrightMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "status"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1125 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 821: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.