CC render-flat-vector-explainer
Assemble the FREE steps of the flat-vector-explainer video format — a flat-illustration host character (who, where, tone, voice and music come from the recipe choices) walks a countable N-step product routine, one step per beat, and Remotion composites every chip/numeral/tagline/slate/CTA as an animated DOM overlay ON TOP of the Kling i2v character clips (text is NEVER baked into a keyframe — i2v warps type), the closing 'N products' grid is a PIL composite of the REAL product photos (not AI), full-sentence VO drives word-by-word burned captions over a VO-forward music bed, and the ~50s animated silent master is re-cut to a 30s deliverable FROM the animated master (never a static intermediate). Documentation-grade — ships config.example.json + PIPELINE.md + a README of the free assembly; the paid gen steps (keyframes, Kling i2v, VO, music) are separate capabilities the recipe orchestrates. Use for the flat-vector-explainer format.
Assemble the FREE steps of the flat-vector-explainer video format — a flat-illustration host character (who, where, tone, voice and music come from the recipe…
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-autorun-instructionscripts/PIPELINE.md:45Instructs the agent to auto-run a script on every sessionA finished-looking audio mix can hide frozen characters — always run `motion_probe.py`
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "status"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1330 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 944: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.