SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC render-hypermotion

Assemble the FREE steps of the product-hypermotion + kinetic-typography video format — dice ONE Seedance 2.0 hypermotion clip into 5-6 segments and intercut them with PIL kinetic-typography spec/CTA cards (italic skew, 1.08x outline echo, 3D extrusion, slam-with-shake, inversion flash) plus a real-logo PIL end card (base64-decoded from the brand SVG), center-crop 1:1 to 9:16, and explicit-map mux a music bed. Deterministic, FREE (PIL + FFmpeg), no paid calls, the real logo and spec typography stay pixel-crisp. The paid steps (the ONE Seedance i2v, the music) are separate capabilities; the recipe orchestrates them. Use for the product-hypermotion format.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 6 files body ≈ 1 248 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Assemble the FREE steps of the product-hypermotion + kinetic-typography video format — dice ONE Seedance 2.0 hypermotion clip into 5-6 segments and intercut…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "status"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1248 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 661: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.