SKILLEMALL.ai

AC render-ig-live-gallery

Render an 'Instagram-Live social-proof gallery' video from a config — ~5 real brand product stills each framed as an Instagram-LIVE card (IG gradient-ring avatar, username, verified check, red LIVE badge, viewer count, close X, a short claim-free live-comment feed, an empty 'Add a comment…' bar, and reaction hearts floating up the right edge), with a brand-approved benefit sentence building one phrase per slide and a clean logo endcard, rendered deterministically with PIL frames plus FFmpeg — FREE (the music bed comes from create-music-elevenlabs), products and wordmark stay crisp. Use for the ig-live-gallery format.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 839 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Render an 'Instagram-Live social-proof gallery' video from a config — ~5 real brand product stills each framed as an Instagram-LIVE card (IG gradient-ring…

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "status"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 839 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 624: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.