SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC render-stopmotion-hand-swatch-cycle

Assemble a stop-motion hand-swatch-cycle product-demo ad from a config — a sequence of still PLATES (one hand swiping a single-barrel product across a test surface, the barrel + swatch changing per plate while the hand, background, crop, and lighting stay locked) is PNG→mp4 loop-encoded at each plate's own stop-motion hold (fast motion frames 150–250ms, per-shade ~380ms, hero beats 1100–1800ms), concat-demuxed with HARD cuts into a silent master, closed on a Playwright HTML-rendered branded end card (serif tagline + sans subtitle + real logo SVG over a hero BG, never AI-rendered text), and muxed with a pre-sourced music track playing under the end card with a fade tail (no VO). This is the FREE deterministic assembly stage (loop-encode + concat-demux + end-card render + music mux); the master-anchor plate, shade plates, and end-card BG come from create-image-gpt-image-fal and the track from create-music-elevenlabs. Use for the stopmotion-hand-swatch-cycle format.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 6 files body ≈ 972 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Assemble a stop-motion hand-swatch-cycle product-demo ad from a config — a sequence of still PLATES (one hand swiping a single-barrel product across a test…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorPlaywrightMarketingDesignMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "status"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 7 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 972 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 977: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.