SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC verify-product-image

QC gate for a generated static ad image — verify the file opens, matches the requested dimensions, shows the correct product/subject (right shape, colour, label, logo), and has no garbled text or severe artifacts. Records pass/fail/needs-human in verification.md. Used as the final check in the static ad remix flow before shipping.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: gooseworks-ai 2 files body ≈ 232 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

QC gate for a generated static ad image — verify the file opens, matches the requested dimensions, shows the correct product/subject (right shape, colour…

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

AnalyzerDesignCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: goose-skills

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 232 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4Structure: 2 headings, hard to scan
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 332: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.