SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC gsd-headless

Orchestrate GSD (Get Shit Done) projects programmatically via headless CLI. Use when an agent needs to create milestones from specs, execute software development workflows, monitor task progress, check project status, or control GSD execution (pause/stop/skip/steer). Triggers on requests to "run gsd", "create milestone", "execute project", "check gsd status", "orchestrate development", "run headless workflow", or any programmatic interaction with the GSD project management system. Essential for building orchestrators that coordinate multiple GSD workers.

gsd-build/gsd-2 Agent Skills author: gsd-build MIT 4 files body ≈ 1 976 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Orchestrate GSD (Get Shit Done) projects programmatically via headless CLI.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1976 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 560: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.