SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB cwd-rollup

Roll up Claude Code sessions by working directory (project) from Agent Monitor data — session count, total cost, total tokens, and last-active timestamp per cwd — so per-project activity can be compared at a glance. Use when summarizing where effort and spend went across projects.

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor Agent Skills author: hoangsonww 2 files body ≈ 566 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 26 h ago

Roll up Claude Code sessions by working directory (project) from Agent Monitor data — session count, total cost, total tokens, and last-active timestamp per…

As a process B 77/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers

ProcedureAI and agentsData and analyticsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
77/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Failures and branches w 10
55
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 77/100

    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 566 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 281: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.