SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC faa-ams-vv

Knowledge pack synthesized from FAA AMS Lifecycle Verification and Validation Guidelines, Version 4.0 (January 2023): verify-vs-validate, the three tiers, decision-point-gated V&V across the AMS lifecycle, and shift-left. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (the January 2023 guidelines); FAA acquisition V&V doctrine, not a general SE process model, not a requirements manual, and not a test-design textbook; CMMI for Development v1.2 named and paraphrased, never copied; surrounding AMS lifecycle is faa-sem; phase tables are January 2023 snapshots, not live authority; reconstructed reference notes, not FAA guidance, and no FAA endorsement.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs Agent Skills author: jgsystemsconsulting 10 files body ≈ 2 872 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Knowledge pack synthesized from FAA AMS Lifecycle Verification and Validation Guidelines, Version 4.0 (January 2023): verify-vs-validate, the three tiers…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 42 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2872 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 636: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.