SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD superreview-setup

Generates a project-tailored deep-review skill: domain-expert routing + scope discipline (blast radius, delivery, closeout) + mechanical gates + adversarial validation. Triggers: superreview, generate review skill, deep review skill, scope discipline review

kochetkov-ma/claude-brewcode Claude Code author: kochetkov-ma 13 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 10 688 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 h ago

Generates a project-tailored deep-review skill: domain-expert routing + scope discipline (blast radius, delivery, closeout) + mechanical gates + adversarial…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/SKILL.md.template, references/scope.md.template, references/scope.md

AnalyzerGitHubData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
79/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
56
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: references/SKILL.md.template, references/scope.md.template, references/scope.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: superreview-setup (kochetkov-ma/claude-brewcode)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Glob Grep Bash Agent AskUserQuestion

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 10688 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/SKILL.md.template
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/scope.md.template
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/scope.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/intent-guard.md.template
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/{python,java-kotlin,typescript-react,go}.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/SKILL.md.template, references/scope.md.template, references/scope.md
  • 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: references/SKILL.md.template, references/scope.md.template, references/scope.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 42 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 10688 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (34 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -216 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 257: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.