CC memory-sync-setup
Generates a project-tailored memory-sync skill: memory surface batches, checkable-fact catalogue, non-growth sync, independent verify, self-sync, agent re-audit. Triggers: memory sync init, generate memory sync, sync memory skill, установи memory-sync, синхронизируй память
Generates a project-tailored memory-sync skill: memory surface batches, checkable-fact catalogue, non-growth sync, independent verify, self-sync, agent…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/*.md, references/SKILL.md.template
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Edit Glob Grep Bash Agent AskUserQuestion
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 10154 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/*.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/SKILL.md.template - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 88, 158, 321, 322, 452): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/*.md, references/SKILL.md.template
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 10154 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (16 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 273: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.