SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC frontend-testing

Use when writing or changing Vitest or React Testing Library tests under `web/` or `packages/dify-ui/`, or when the user explicitly requests frontend test strategy, including evaluation of an existing strategy. Do not use for frontend code-review-only requests, general testability discussion, Python tests, or Cucumber/Playwright E2E.

langgenius/dify Agent Skills author: langgenius NOASSERTION 1 file body ≈ 147 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Use when writing or changing Vitest or React Testing Library tests under web/ or packages/dify-ui/, or when the user explicitly requests frontend test…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorPlaywrightSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Steps. 2 steps
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 147 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Structure: 1 headings, hard to scan
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 335: enough signal without eating the budget

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.