SKILLEMALL.ai

CD eccc-jeanne-sulzer

Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills Agent Skills author: lawve-ai 11 files body ≈ 3 675 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 84 min ago

Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal).

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerGitHubResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/jurisprudence-map.md:92
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    Elements (Digest 3.3.2): (i) superior-subordinate relationship with effective command and control or authority and control; (ii) the superior knew or had reason to know; (iii) failure to take measures

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (eccc-jeanne-sulzer) differs from the folder (eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzer)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3675 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 498: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.