SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz

Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills Agent Skills author: lawve-ai 20 files body ≈ 4 492 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 89 min ago

Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: CHANGELOG.md

AnalyzerWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: CHANGELOG.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: CHANGELOG.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 29): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: CHANGELOG.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: CHANGELOG.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4492 tokens
  • 85Steps. 61 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 472: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (16 of 16)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.