SKILLEMALL.ai

CD mandarinat

Assistant académique des enseignants-chercheurs en droit (professeurs, maîtres de conférences, doctorants, ATER, chargés de TD). Six tâches : recherche juridique approfondie à dominante doctrinale ; relecture de documents (thèses, articles, copies, mémoires) avec commentaires Word, vérification des références, indices de plagiat ou d'IA, cohérence argumentative ; sujets et corrigés d'examen ; mise à jour de cours, d'ouvrages et de documents ; création de cours avec support Word et PowerPoint ou Slides ; fiches de TD. Recherche outillée (LibreJustice, OpenLegi, Themia, LegalDataHunter, doctrine HAL/OpenAlex), noyau anti-hallucination avec tableau de vérification remis en document séparé. À utiliser pour toute demande liée à l'enseignement ou à la recherche en droit — cours, TD, examen, sujet, corrigé, dissertation, commentaire d'arrêt, relecture, mise à jour, bibliographie, recherche doctrinale — même si la skill n'est pas nommée. Pas pour les QCM ni les exercices rapides (skill qcm-exercices).

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills Agent Skills author: lawve-ai 30 files · 8 scripts body ≈ 3 930 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 77 min ago

Assistant académique des enseignants-chercheurs en droit (professeurs, maîtres de conférences, doctorants, ATER, chargés de TD).

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureTableauPowerPointWordWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (mandarinat) differs from the folder (mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 32 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3930 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1008: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -34 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (20 of 20)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.