BF privacy-policy-malik-taiar
Guide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a privacy policy for a website or application.
Guide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR.
As a process F 28/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: assets/CNIL_droits_personnes.pdf, assets/CNIL_durees_conservation.pdf, assets/CNIL_finalites.pdf
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/CNIL_droits_personnes.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/CNIL_durees_conservation.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/CNIL_finalites.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/CNIL_transparence.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/CNIL_principes_rgpd.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/RGPD_texte_officiel.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/sample_template_politique_confidentialite.docx
Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: assets/CNIL_droits_personnes.pdf, assets/CNIL_durees_conservation.pdf, assets/CNIL_finalites.pdf
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (privacy-policy-malik-taiar) differs from the folder (privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiar)
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Steps. 106 steps, 9 vague phrases
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4356 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 211: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 33 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 106 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.