BC chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis
Facilitates structured roleplay, debate, and synthesis to resolve decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Surfaces assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss and integrates competing priorities into coherent recommendations. Use when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles, explore tradeoffs between incompatible values, or synthesize conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy.
Facilitates structured roleplay, debate, and synthesis to resolve decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 85Steps. 98 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2932 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -224 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 526: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 98 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.