SKILLEMALL.ai

BD debt-design

Matches the kind of debt a firm issues to the assets it finances — maturity, currency, fixed or floating, and features such as convertibility or commodity linkage — using asset duration and the sensitivity of firm value and operating income to interest rates, inflation, real growth and exchange rates. Use when advising on what debt to issue, reviewing an existing debt structure, choosing debt maturity or debt currency, deciding fixed versus floating, or after finding an optimal debt ratio.

lyndonkl/claude Agent Skills author: lyndonkl 6 files · 1 script body ≈ 5 699 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 16 h ago

Matches the kind of debt a firm issues to the assets it finances — maturity, currency, fixed or floating, and features such as convertibility or commodity…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerFinanceData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5699 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5699 tokens
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 494: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.