BC fetch-arxiv-recent
Fetches arXiv papers submitted within a given date window matching a keyword set, with optional restriction to one or more arXiv categories (e.g. cs.LG, cs.CL, cs.CV, stat.ML, math.ST, q-bio.QM). Wraps the public `export.arxiv.org/api/query` endpoint, parses Atom XML, handles pagination, and normalizes records to the same canonical shape as `fetch-preprint-recent` and `fetch-pubmed-recent` so a calling agent can dedupe across sources. Domain-neutral — usable for any literature scan that crosses CS, ML, statistics, math, physics, or quantitative biology. Use when user mentions arXiv, cs.LG, ML papers, NeurIPS-adjacent preprints, weekly arXiv scan, or when a literature-scan agent needs arXiv records alongside bioRxiv / medRxiv / PubMed.
Fetches arXiv papers submitted within a given date window matching a keyword set, with optional restriction to one or more arXiv categories (e.g. cs.LG…
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 88, 167, 181): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2624 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 744: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.