AB ml-primitive-decoder
Decomposes any ML construct (attention, layer norm, softmax, convolution, dropout, contrastive loss, diffusion step, gradient descent update, cross-entropy) into the small set of linear-algebra primitives it's built from, then explains why those primitives produce the observed behavior. Includes an ablation thought experiment that asks "what would break if you removed this piece?". Use when the user asks "why does X work?", "explain attention/conv/norm intuitively", "what's actually happening in this layer", or when reading an architecture paper and a particular block doesn't make sense yet.
Decomposes any ML construct (attention, layer norm, softmax, convolution, dropout, contrastive loss, diffusion step, gradient descent update, cross-entropy)…
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3407 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 598: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.