SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB mlb-faab-sizer

Computes FAAB (Free Agent Acquisition Budget) recommended and maximum bids for Yahoo fantasy baseball waiver targets. Implements the baseball-specific layering of the faab-bid-framework (positional_need_fit, role_certainty, urgency, season_pace, league-inflation calibration) and DELEGATES the game-theoretic primitives -- first-price shading and winner's-curse haircut -- to the sibling skills `auction-first-price-shading` and `auction-winners-curse-haircut`. Produces a recommended bid, a hard ceiling, a rationale with the full delegation chain, and guardrail flags. Use when the user asks "how much should I bid on X", mentions FAAB bid, waiver bid amount, blind bid, Yahoo waiver claim sizing, or when mlb-waiver-analyst needs a bid amount for an identified target.

lyndonkl/claude Agent Skills author: lyndonkl 4 files body ≈ 2 377 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 16 h ago

Computes FAAB (Free Agent Acquisition Budget) recommended and maximum bids for Yahoo fantasy baseball waiver targets.

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsData and analyticsSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 35 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2377 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 771: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.