SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC morphological-analysis-triz

Explores solution spaces systematically through morphological analysis (parameter-option matrices) and resolves technical contradictions using TRIZ inventive principles to generate novel, non-obvious solutions. Use when exploring all feasible design alternatives before prototyping, resolving technical contradictions (speed vs precision, strength vs weight, cost vs quality), generating novel product configurations, finding inventive solutions to engineering problems, identifying patent opportunities, or when user mentions morphological analysis, Zwicky box, TRIZ, inventive principles, systematic innovation, or design space exploration.

lyndonkl/claude Agent Skills author: lyndonkl 4 files body ≈ 1 607 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 16 h ago

Explores solution spaces systematically through morphological analysis (parameter-option matrices) and resolves technical contradictions using TRIZ inventive…

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 46 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1607 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 642: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.