SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC platform-voice-check

Runs a voice-fidelity audit on each of the four substacker platform outputs (Substack Note, X thread, LinkedIn post, cross-post blurb) before reporting Distribution Translator completion. Checks for voice-don'ts (banned vocabulary, emoji, generic openers, marketing math without source), voice-do compliance (paper attribution preserved, hedges preserved, em-dash reframes present), platform-specific tonal shifts. Emits voice-check.md with pass/fail per artifact. Trigger keywords — platform voice check, voice-check, gate, distribution voice, slop-leak check.

lyndonkl/claude Agent Skills author: lyndonkl 1 file body ≈ 675 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 16 h ago

Runs a voice-fidelity audit on each of the four substacker platform outputs (Substack Note, X thread, LinkedIn post, cross-post blurb) before reporting…

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerWriting and documentsData and analyticsSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 675 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 561: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.