SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC visualization-choice-reporting

Matches visualization types to data questions and creates narrated reports that highlight insights and recommend actions. Covers chart selection (comparison, trend, distribution, relationship, composition, geographic), perceptual best practices, and narrative reporting (headline, pattern, context, meaning, action). Use when analyzing data for patterns, building dashboards, presenting metrics, monitoring KPIs, or when user mentions "visualize this", "what chart should I use", "create a dashboard", "analyze this data", "show trends", "report on".

lyndonkl/claude Agent Skills author: lyndonkl 4 files body ≈ 3 065 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 16 h ago

Matches visualization types to data questions and creates narrated reports that highlight insights and recommend actions.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 85Steps. 46 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3065 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 550: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.