SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC analog-occultism

Use this skill to create subject-neutral images and videos in an analog occultism / industrial CRT noir aesthetic: near-monochrome archival technical atmosphere, severe low-key lighting, tactile signal degradation, industrial geometry, and quiet unresolved tension. Use for portraits, products, environments, interfaces, diagrams, abstract forms, stills, and motion. Do not use for colorful cyberpunk, vaporwave, glossy advertising, conventional horror, or clean digital renders.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 5 files body ≈ 2 295 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

Use this skill to create subject-neutral images and videos in an analog occultism / industrial CRT noir aesthetic: near-monochrome archival technical…

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorMedia and videoAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 5): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 28 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2295 tokens
    • medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 479: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.